DECLASSIFIED: Project Sun Streak’s Anomalous Cognition Operation to Locate the Ark of the Covenant
Formerly classified CIA documents—declassified in August 2000 but recently circulating through digital channels—expose a clandestine 1988 operation deploying paranormal intelligence collection methodologies to pinpoint the biblical Ark of the Covenant. The operation, executed under Project Sun Streak’s anomalous cognition protocols, employed Remote Viewer No. 032 in a blind-target acquisition exercise on December 5, 1988.
REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOL: Controlled Target Acquisition Parameters
The session adhered to established remote viewing tradecraft: the subject received no prior target briefing—a safeguard against analytical overlay and cognitive contamination. Remote Viewer No. 032’s perceptual data stream yielded precise target descriptors:
“Target is a container. This container has another container inside of it. The target is fashioned of wood, gold, and silver,” the operative reported, further detailing it as “similar in shape to a coffin and is decorated with seraphim.”
These descriptors demonstrate remarkable congruence with biblical specifications in Exodus 25:10-22, delineating the Ark’s construction parameters: a wooden chest measuring approximately 4.5 feet long, 2.7 feet wide, and 2.7 feet high, overlaid with gold, crowned with golden cherubim figures.
GEOSPATIAL DATA POINTS: Environmental and Demographic Indicators
Remote Viewer No. 032’s perceptual feed included multiple corroborating geolocational markers:
- Subterranean positioning: “Hidden—subterranean, dark, and wet” environment
- Architectural identifiers: “Visuals of surrounding buildings indicated the presence of Mosque domes”
- Cultural signature: Presence of “Arabic-speaking individuals dressed in all white”
This intelligence mosaic suggests a Middle Eastern location—convergent with historical hypotheses regarding the artefact’s disposition following the 586 BCE Babylonian incursion.
SECURITY PROTOCOLS: Non-Conventional Defensive Mechanisms
The viewer’s transmission included anomalous security parameters surrounding the target:
“The target is protected by entities and can only be opened by those who are authorized to do so—this container will not/cannot be opened until the time is deemed correct. Individuals opening the container by prying or striking are destroyed by the container’s protectors through the use of a power unknown to us.”
This assessment parallels theological accounts in biblical sources where unauthorized personnel interfacing with the Ark experienced lethal consequences.
ARTIFACT FUNCTION: Operational Parameters and Significance
Remote Viewer No. 032 provided metadata regarding the artifact’s operational significance:
“The purpose of the target is to bring people together. It has something to do with ceremony, memory, homage, the resurrection. There is an aspect of spirituality, information, lessons, and historical knowledge far beyond what we now know.”
These functional descriptors correlate with the Ark’s historical role in Judaic ceremonies and its theological significance as a communication nexus between divine and human domains.
CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Internal Validation Metrics
Project Sun Streak’s operational utility faced internal skepticism. Joe McMoneagle, former U.S. Army chief warrant officer and pioneering remote viewing asset, evaluated the session as “bogus,” categorizing it as a probable training simulation rather than actionable intelligence collection.
“If someone claims that remote viewing proves the existence of something, such as the Ark of the Covenant, they must produce the Ark to substantiate their claim,” McMoneagle informed The New York Post.
McMoneagle’s assessment highlights the critical validation challenge inherent in remote viewing applications: the absence of physical confirmation undermines intelligence reliability metrics.
Similar Posts:
COMPETING INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS: Current Artifact Location Theories
Contemporary analysis produces three primary hypotheses regarding the artifact’s present disposition:
1. Ethiopian Repository Hypothesis
The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church claims custodianship of the Ark within the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in Aksum. Access restrictions prevent independent verification—only a designated guardian monk maintains proximity to the alleged artifact.
2. Jerusalem Underground Storage Theory
Some believe a possible concealment beneath Jerusalem’s Temple Mount prior to Babylonian forces breaching the city’s defenses. Geopolitical and religious sensitivities preclude comprehensive archaeological reconnaissance of this location.
3. Destruction Scenario
Some analytical models support the hypothesis that the artifact was destroyed during Jerusalem’s fall to Babylonian forces, leaving no physical trace beyond historical documentation.
OPERATIONAL CONTEXT: Project Sun Streak Parameters
The Ark location operation occurred within Project Sun Streak’s operational window (1985-1995). This program constituted one phase in the U.S. intelligence community’s multi-decade exploration of psychoenergetic information collection methodologies.
The Defense Intelligence Agency maintained operational control of Project Sun Streak as a component of the broader STAR GATE program—investigating anomalous human capabilities for intelligence applications. Despite occasional successful data points, the program underwent termination following the American Institutes for Research’s 1995 efficacy assessment, which concluded that remote viewing methodologies failed to produce consistently actionable intelligence.
DECLASSIFICATION IMPACT: Public Domain Intelligence Transfer
The documents’ reclassification to unprotected status in 2000 and subsequent digital propagation demonstrates the enduring crypto historical interest in both intelligence methodologies and theological artifacts. The information transfer has catalyzed renewed analytical discourse across multiple academic disciplines including historical analysis, archaeological research, and theological studies.
While the declassified data provides no definitive artifact geolocation, it offers unprecedented visibility into Cold War-era applications of non-conventional intelligence collection methodologies when conventional HUMINT and SIGINT channels encountered operational limitations.
ANALYTICAL GAP ASSESSMENT: Missing Intelligence Components
Several intelligence gaps persist in the available documentation:
- Specific coordinates: While environmental descriptors suggest Middle Eastern positioning, precise geolocation data remains absent
- Operational motivation: The strategic rationale behind targeting this specific artifact lacks documentation
- Follow-up operations: Records of subsequent validation attempts remain classified or non-existent
- Methodology details: Comprehensive remote viewing protocols employed during this specific operation require further documentation
These intelligence gaps preclude definitive conclusions regarding both the artifact’s location and the operation’s ultimate utility within the broader intelligence collection framework.
Frequently Asked Questions
Project Sun Streak was a classified CIA operation (1985-1995) that used remote viewing and other paranormal intelligence collection methods. In December 1988, the project attempted to locate the biblical Ark of the Covenant using Remote Viewer No. 032. The project was part of the broader STAR GATE program investigating psychic phenomena for intelligence purposes. Documents about this operation were declassified in August 2000 and have recently resurfaced in digital channels.
Remote Viewer No. 032 described the Ark as “a container with another container inside,” made of “wood, gold, and silver,” and “similar in shape to a coffin and decorated with seraphim.” The viewer also mentioned it was in a “subterranean, dark, and wet” environment near buildings with “Mosque domes” and “Arabic-speaking individuals dressed in all white.” These descriptions align with biblical specifications in Exodus 25:10-22 and suggest a Middle Eastern location.
The credibility of the remote viewing session was questioned within the intelligence community. Joe McMoneagle, a former U.S. Army chief warrant officer and pioneering remote viewer, evaluated the session as “bogus” and likely a training simulation rather than actionable intelligence. He emphasized that without physical confirmation (actually finding the Ark), the remote viewing claims couldn’t be substantiated. In 1995, the American Institutes for Research concluded that remote viewing methodologies failed to produce consistently actionable intelligence, leading to the program’s termination.
There are three primary theories about the Ark’s current location: 1) The Ethiopian Repository Hypothesis – The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church claims to have the Ark in the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in Aksum, with access restricted to a single guardian monk; 2) Jerusalem Underground Storage Theory – Some believe it’s hidden beneath Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, though geopolitical tensions prevent thorough archaeological investigation; 3) Destruction Scenario – The Ark may have been destroyed during Jerusalem’s fall to Babylonian forces, leaving no physical trace beyond historical records.
Remote Viewer No. 032 stated that the Ark’s purpose was “to bring people together” and had connections to “ceremony, memory, homage, the resurrection.” The viewer also mentioned aspects of “spirituality, information, lessons, and historical knowledge far beyond what we now know.” These descriptions align with the Ark’s historical role in Judaic ceremonies and its theological significance as a communication point between divine and human realms.
According to the remote viewer, the Ark “is protected by entities and can only be opened by those who are authorized to do so.” The viewer warned that the container “will not/cannot be opened until the time is deemed correct” and that unauthorized individuals attempting to open it “by prying or striking are destroyed by the container’s protectors through the use of a power unknown to us.” This description parallels biblical accounts where unauthorized handling of the Ark resulted in lethal consequences.
