Artistic Recreation Of Epstein and Trump photo

Govind Tekale

427-1 Vote On Epstein Files Act Moves Ahead As Rep Clay Higgins Warns Of ‘Thousands Of Innocents

Congress, Democrat, Democratic Party Politics, DOJ, Epstein, Republican Party, Republicans, Trump, White House

The Lone Vote: Clay Higgins and the Epstein Files Transparency Act

On November 18, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act with an overwhelming 427-1 vote, requiring the Department of Justice to release all unclassified records related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. The Senate approved it unanimously the same day via unanimous consent, sending it to President Trump’s desk.

The lone dissenting vote came from Louisiana Republican Rep. Clay Higgins, who argued the bill “abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure” and could harm innocent people named in investigative files. While House Speaker Mike Johnson and other Republicans initially shared similar concerns, political pressure led most to vote yes to avoid accusations of blocking transparency. The House Oversight Committee has already released over 60,000 pages of Epstein-related documents, though critics say much of it was already public.

The Lone Dissent: Clay Higgins and the Epstein Files

When Congress voted 427-1 to force the release of Jeffrey Epstein investigation files, Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins stood alone in opposition

427
Votes FOR Release
1
Vote AGAINST
30
Days to Publish
60K+
Pages Released So Far

Timeline: How We Got Here

August 2025
The House Oversight Committee released over 60,000 pages of Epstein-related documents. Critics said the release contained mostly materials already publicly available. Read more about the initial document release
Early November 2025
President Trump initially opposed the bill’s release, calling it a “hoax” through his public statements. House Speaker Mike Johnson stated the case is “not a hoax” while expressing concerns about protecting innocent people and victims mentioned in the files. Trump’s MAGA base revolts over Epstein files
Mid-November 2025
Facing mounting pressure from his base, Trump reversed course and demanded the files be released within four hours, threatening legal action against critics. Trump threatens WSJ, demands Epstein files in 4 hours
November 18, 2025
The House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) with a 427-1 vote. The Senate approved it unanimously via unanimous consent the same day, sending it to Trump’s desk. Trump orders Bondi to release files

The Historic Vote Breakdown

House of Representatives 427 YES
99.77%
Lone Dissenting Vote 1 NO
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA)

Higgins’ Reasoning: Why He Voted No

Criminal Justice Precedent
“It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America,” Higgins stated on X. He argued the bill disregards long-standing protections built into federal investigative processes.
Innocent People at Risk
“As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc,” he wrote, expressing concern that broad release could harm those not criminally implicated.
Privacy vs. Transparency
Higgins indicated he would support the measure only if the Senate amended it to “properly address privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated.” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said amendments were unlikely.
Source: ABC News

Key Figures in the Transparency Fight

Clay Higgins
Rep. (R-LA), Oversight Committee
The sole “no” vote. Former law enforcement officer who chairs the Oversight subcommittee on federal law enforcement. Maintains his opposition is rooted in protecting criminal justice procedures and innocent persons.
Mike Johnson
House Speaker (R-LA)
Initially expressed concerns about protecting innocent people and victims, but voted yes, stating “none of us want to go on record and in any way be accused of not being for maximum transparency.” He told CBS News the case is “not a hoax.”
Thomas Massie
Rep. (R-KY)
Co-introduced the legislation with Rep. Ro Khanna. Led the discharge petition to bypass leadership blockage. Said Republicans who vote against release “will have voted to protect paedophiles.”
Marjorie Taylor Greene
Rep. (R-GA)
Pushed for transparency, breaking with Trump over the issue. Called out the president directly: “A traitor is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves; a patriot is an American that serves the United States.”
Pam Bondi
U.S. Attorney General
Will oversee the DOJ’s compliance with the Act. The bill requires her to release all unclassified records within 30 days, with authority to withhold information that would jeopardize active investigations or identify victims.
Donald Trump
President of the United States
Reversed his position from attacking those wanting file release to saying there was “nothing to hide.” Expected to sign the bill into law.

What the Bill Requires

The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) mandates that Attorney General Pam Bondi release “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” related to Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell no later than 30 days after the law is enacted.

Materials to be released include: internal DOJ communications, flight logs, travel records, and individuals or entities connected to Epstein. The Attorney General has authority to withhold information that would jeopardize any active federal investigation or identifies any victims.

Jeffrey Epstein, a financier, was found dead in his New York prison cell in 2019 in what a coroner ruled was a suicide. He was being held on charges of sex trafficking, having previously been convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008.

Trump and Epstein previously socialized in similar circles, but the president has stated he cut ties with Epstein before his 2008 conviction. The president has publicly denied any knowledge of Epstein’s criminal misconduct.

Last week, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee published email chains, including correspondence between Epstein and Maxwell. Some emails reference Trump’s name in connection with individuals Epstein knew.

Virginia Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who died in April, stated in a 2016 deposition that she “never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts” and wrote in her memoir that “Trump couldn’t have been friendlier” during their limited interactions. Speaking after the vote, Giuffre’s brother Sky Roberts praised his sister’s role in seeking justice for Epstein survivors: “She did it, she paved the way.”

Understanding the Controversy

Why was Clay Higgins the only “no” vote?
Higgins, a former law enforcement officer, maintained that the bill violated traditional criminal justice procedures that protect innocent people mentioned in investigative files. He argued that witnesses, alibi providers, and family members could be harmed by broad public release. While House Speaker Mike Johnson shared similar concerns initially, political pressure led most Republicans to vote yes to avoid accusations of blocking transparency.
What has already been released about Epstein?
In 2025, the House Oversight Committee released over 60,000 pages of Epstein-related documents. However, critics including Democrats on the committee said the release contained mostly materials already publicly available, with limited new information. The DOJ stated in a July 2025 review that there was no evidence of an Epstein “client list” used for blackmail and concluded Epstein died by suicide in 2019.
How did Trump’s position change?
Trump initially opposed the bill’s release, calling it a “hoax” in public statements. House Speaker Johnson expressed concerns about protecting victims and innocent people while blocking the measure from reaching a floor vote initially. However, facing mounting pressure from his MAGA base and conservative supporters like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Trump reversed course and indicated support for releasing the files, saying there was “nothing to hide.” The reversal came after significant backlash from Trump’s conservative base.
What protections exist for victims in the bill?
The bill gives Attorney General Pam Bondi the power to withhold information that would jeopardize any active federal investigation or identifies any victims. However, Higgins argued these protections were insufficient and wanted the Senate to amend the bill to better protect privacy of victims and innocent Americans named but not criminally implicated. Senate Majority Leader Thune indicated amendments were unlikely given the overwhelming 427-1 House vote and Trump’s commitment to sign.
What happens next?
After passing both chambers of Congress, the bill now heads to President Trump’s desk. He has indicated he will sign it into law. Once enacted, Attorney General Pam Bondi will have 30 days to release all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to Epstein and Maxwell. The materials must be published in a searchable and downloadable format. Epstein survivors and advocacy groups have pressed for full disclosure, with Annie Farmer stating that keeping files under wraps amounts to “institutional betrayal.”

What Was Covered

The House of Representatives passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act 427-1 on November 18, 2025, with the Senate approving it unanimously the same day. Rep. Clay Higgins cast the sole opposing vote, citing concerns about criminal justice procedures and the protection of innocent individuals mentioned in investigative files. The bill requires Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all unclassified DOJ records related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days of enactment.

The legislation passed after President Trump reversed his initial opposition and indicated support for transparency. The House Oversight Committee has released over 60,000 pages of documents, though critics noted much material was already publicly available. Epstein survivors and advocacy groups have pressed for full disclosure, while lawmakers debated balancing transparency with victim privacy protections.

For ongoing coverage of the Epstein Files release and related developments, see our articles on Trump’s directive to AG Bondi and the MAGA base reaction to transparency demands.

Leave a Comment